On Tuesday, US District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose, Calif., gave remarks that the company must face a nationwide lawsuit that aims to provide refunds when kids spent their parents money on facebook, Reuters said Wednesday. Estimated to number in the hundreds of thousands, the plaintiffs contend that Facebook has violated California law by claiming "all sales are final" policy in denying the refunds.
This issue of children buying stuff online without the permission of their parents is growing day by day and has cost other big names in technology a decent amount of money.
In January 2014, Apple was orderes to refund $32.5 million in a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over act of children to make in-app purchases without parental consent. Last September, this issue caused GOOGLE $19 million in refunding. over the same issue, while in July, the FTC ordered AMAZON over unauthorized in-app charges made by children. Given the outcome of these past cases, Facebook is most probably to face a tough challenge in court and may end up having to settle the suit and refund the purchases.
The lawsuit mentions that the company allowed children to use their parents' credit cards to buy Facebook Credits, a virtual currency which has retired in favor of Facebook Payments. Facebook argued against class action status for the suit by saying that the individual claims were too different. But the judge didn't buy that argument.
Though some minors undoubtedly may wish to continue making purchases through credit or debit cards they do not have permission to use, such a desire cannot prevent the named plaintiffs from bringing suit to demand that Facebook's policies comply with the law," Judge Freeman wrote in remarks, according to Reuters.
Even as the suit, which was initiated in April 2012, moves ahead using class action status, Freeman ruled that any refunds would be doled out on a case-by-case basis rather than to the group of plaintiffs as a whole. A trial date is set for October 19.
A Facebook spokesman said in his statement: "The court correctly found that it would be inappropriate to permit plaintiffs to seek refunds on behalf of the proposed class. We believe the remaining claims about our policy are without merit and we will continue to defend ourselves vigorously."
No comments:
Post a Comment